Do NOT Vote Tory on 6th May!

Johann Hari gives good reasons:

Cameron says he is demanding spending cuts not because he has a theological belief in a small state, but because they are necessary to pay off the deficit – but this claim is undermined by the fact that he wants to strip funding from state programmes that actually save us money. Look for example at SureStart, the network of 3,000 children’s centres across Britain built under the current government. They are based on a fascinating series of discoveries. It has been proven that most poor children fall behind in language skills and stimulation long before they ever walk through the school gates – and they never catch up. The first few years of life are crucial for the formation of a child’s mental abilities. Get them early and give them intensive encouragement, with expert advice for their parents, and you can change their life.

This isn’t speculation. In 1964, they launched the first SureStart-style project in Michigan – and Dr Lawrence Schweinhart and a team of academics has been monitoring the kids ever since. Did it work? Well, they were 50 per cent less likely to become teenage mothers than their siblings who weren’t put in the programme, and by the time they were 40, they were 46 per cent less likely to have been to prison and 26 per cent less likely to be on welfare. Their incomes were 42 per cent higher. So for every £1 you spend on it, you save the state £7 further down the line. Yet Cameron, on becoming Tory leader, dismissed SureStart as “a microcosm of government failure”. Now he says he will keep it in some form, but already he says huge chunks of its budget will go to other things, and few expect it to survive long. If he can’t keep the single best policy for reducing inequality – one that costs less than nothing in the medium term – what shreds of progress can survive his rule?

Could an argument like this have played in last night’s leaders debate? Surely not – last night was about points scoring and sloganeering. But this is the type of inevitable outcome from Cameron’s policies if the Tories get into power. Granted Labour’s done very badly at joined-up thinking, let alone joined-up government, but this would be an absolute nightmare. He claims to be opposed to the increased gap between rich and poor which started on the Tories watch (haha), and accelerated under Labour’s – why then offer policies which will keep the process accelerating yet further? And for that matter why vote for them?

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.