RSS Feed

Riots: Some Perspective Needed

Posted on Tuesday, August 9, 2011 in Politics

Let me make one thing clear: I’ve been as frightened by this as everyone else. It’s happened on a small scale in my neighbourhood, in my borough on a much larger scale, and on far too big a scale in my town. I want it to stop – too much petty opportunism and sheer criminality is instilling fear within communities which had until three days ago at least existed under an uneasy truce. But what I don’t agree with is an increase in violence – I’m actually debating with celebrities (some big names) on Twitter right now why water cannon and rubber bullets are wrong. What we need before anything else is perspective. From David Allen Green:

there will be calls for more policing, and far more police powers. People’s fears will need to be allayed by gestures; everyone will need to feel safe again. A liberal approach to law and order will now seem to many as simply inappropriate and misconceived. But there is no good reason to introduce water cannon and rubber bullets. Indeed, in seemingly exceptional times, it is more important to adhere to the rule of law and the normal exercise of police powers.

There may be another riot tonight, or there may be calm. There may be another bout of looting, or there may be preventative police action. But when these riots are over, this new sense of fear may well remain. Society will not have broken, at least not in any objective manner; but people’s confidence that things will always be alright for them in their daily urban lives could perhaps be broken instead.

Water cannon blows people’s eyes out, whether they’re a looter or an innocent bystander, but that’s not even the greater point: it’s impossible to restore law and order by abandoning the rule of law. Our society is predicated upon the presumption of innocence for everyone at all times, unless proven guilty. Using potentially lethal weapons undermines the very fabric of our criminal justice system. The authoritarian left and right however don’t agree and we need to spend time convincing them. Kenan Malik does a great job of looking underneath this crisis:

There is clearly more to the riots than simple random hooliganism. But that does not mean that the riots, as many have claimed, are protests against disenfranchisement, social exclusion and wasted lives. In fact, it’s precisely because of disenfranchisement, social exclusion and wasted lives that these are not ‘protests’ in any meaningful sense, but a mixture of incoherent rage, gang thuggery and teenage mayhem. Disengaged not just from the political process (largely because politicians, especially those on the left, have disengaged from them), there is a generation (in fact more than a generation) with no focus for their anger and resentment, no sense that they can change society and no reason to feel responsible for the consequences of their actions. That is very different from suggesting that the riots were caused by, a response to, or a protest against, unemployment, austerity and the cuts.

Shock, horror, a nuanced look at why this is happening. It’s very easy for all of us at a time like this to lapse into easy left/right generalisations. And the point I highlighted makes far more sense than simply suggesting that there was an easy cause/effect between the cuts agenda and the explosion of violence into London’s (and beyond) streets. But Malik isn’t alone; there’s also the At-Long-Last-I-Have-A-Job-Blog:

The looting that’s engulfing us must become a game-changing moment for our society. Repressing the urges and desires that we have so carefully groomed will not work. We cannot police the problem out of existence. It may well be that in the very short term there must be a robust response because the consequences of this unrest are too devastating for too many of our comrades for it to be simply allowed to run its course. But if we think that crushing this revolt with unprecedented firepower and then carrying on as before will sort the problems out, we are deluded. We have to attack the root causes. We can’t continue to have “good” greed and “bad” greed. We have to regain the cultural understanding that we appear to have lost: that all greed is corrosive. That will require changes in us all, not just in those who are rampaging through our streets.

This is a brilliant, even deeper look at what’s fuelling this seemingly contagious behaviour. We have a society which is indeed now built on the value that greed is good. New Labour built that up to the nth degree, building up the entire economy on the presumption that acquisition for its own sake was a good thing. Crazy levels of debt were built up as people thoughtlessly got things for the sake of getting them. And of course after 2008 we’ve had an equally loud message that it’s possible to get away with unthinkable levels of greed: if you’re a banker you can wreck the entire economy and noone will hold you to account. It seems silly now to think that that message wouldn’t spread out into wider society and have lessons drawn from it. Our values as a whole are utterly fucked up.

I have a few other thoughts:

  • Rolling/’breaking’ news is a problematic factor here. There’s more than a little evidence piling up that opportunistic little shits are seeing disorder as it happens and then joining in. I don’t believe in censoring the press in any way, but ‘breaking’ news doesn’t allow for any understanding, and the BBC at least, as a public service broadcaster should think long and hard about its priorities here.
  • Twitter has been condemned by the Right as a contributing cause, but that’s as moronic as blaming the telephone for violence in the past. The medium isn’t the problem. It’s also disturbing to hear the Met are planning on trawling through thousands of tweets, looking for people inciting violence. Demonising speech, even inflammatory speech, without being able to determine cause & effect, is dangerous.
  • There’s more than a little evidence also that the police allowed certain flashpoints to happen unchecked. There’s either incompetence or appallingly Macchiavellian agendas at play in the middle of this in certain boroughs. This isn’t to say that all the policing throughout this has been bad, but there is the sense that the Met is an even more disordered mess than we’d previously thought. Hopefully today’s effort will be better.

That’s it for now – I don’t have any easy answers. Comments welcome.

Share

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Bring on the comments

  1. Scoobydoofus says:

    I believe that the looters and troublemakers are being emboldened by the totally ineffectual police force who are (as far as I can see) just standing and watching events unfold. Seemingly lacking human decency, the thugs have no incentive to stop at the moment.

    I’ve heard all the arguments about violence escalating, and as far as I’m concerned we have a few steps before we have to draw a line. I’m not one to advocate indiscriminate violence or retaliation, but like I said on Twitter, people are aware that they are not supposed to be participating in this mess, and have to accept the consequences of their choices. If they are innocent bystanders, maybe they should be bystanding somewhere else.

    This is not about people expressing their civil rights, it’s a group of thugs OPPRESSING the rights of others to feel safe and have their property left unmolested. That’s unacceptable, and if a few people getting shot with rubber bullets helps chase these stupid kids off, then I’m all for it.

    If this is allowed to just fizzle out, what have the perpetrators learned? That they can cause mayhem and take what they like, when they like.

    Finally, you mention that water cannons blow people’s eyes out. I’m pretty sure that’s not true; there’s a famous picture of a man in Stuttgart being led away with his eyes bleeding and clearly seriously injured, but not “blown out”, and I think it’s important not to spread misinformation.

  2. admin says:

    Absolutely. But you’re splitting hairs when it comes to the impact of the weapons that you so breezily advocate. As others have pointed out, we’re discussing shooting thieves and muggers. What sort of society does shit like that? Not one I want to be part of, and you are advocating indiscriminate violence in retaliation. What point is there then in having a state? Why not let the police do everything they want at all times? Isn’t that part of how we’ve got ourselves into this mess into the first place?

    Why do the argument have to be so polarising here? The policing last night was by all accounts incompetent in its tactics and numbers. How anyone thought containment would do anything other than send out the most appalling message is beyond me. Why don’t we just police the situation better? It won’t end the problem overnight, but even shooting them won’t.

  3. Owen Blacker says:

    Another great piece, Jason. And current mentions of rubber bullets on the news are definitely making my blood run cold — as is the surprising amount of authoritarianism I’m seeing from supposedly liberal-left friends.

    I definitely disagree with one point, though: “It’s also disturbing to hear the Met are planning on trawling through thousands of tweets, looking for people inciting violence. Demonising speech, even inflammatory speech, without being able to determine cause & effect, is dangerous.”

    I disagree. I have no problem with the Met trawling through Twitter looking for the many idiots who are too stupid to realise they shouldn’t post pictures of themselves posing with their loot. Where the tweets are about specific locations being under thread, I just about have enough faith in our jury system that context will be taken into appropriate account.

    I just hope to fuck they don’t go out with rubber bullets or water cannon tonight. Even better, of course, would be if the disaffected youths of our city could stay home, but I’m not optimistic on that front.

  4. Robin Eccles says:

    First, I in no way condone or excuse the awful events of the last few nights in London and elsewhere, I like most people have been appalled and dismayed by the wanton violence and destruction.
    Equally disquieting is the knee jerk reaction of some people to the situation in calling for the army to be deployed or water cannons and rubber bullets being used.
    I’m old enough to remember instances where the army has been used to try and control out of rioting kids, the first at Kent University, USA where the militia were called in when the governor felt the police could not handle the situation, within an hour 34 students had been injured and 4 of them fatally. A few years later and this time in Northern Ireland, and the bloody sunday massacre.
    Looking back at these incidents no right minded person thinks that the kids that were killed “deserved” to die for throwing stones and causing an affray. In fact in both these incidents the lesson learned was that you don’t use deadly force to control children behaving badly.
    I’m not saying that these idiot don’t need to be punished…but if you send the British army in to sort out rioting kids you will end up with dead british kids, I can’t think that anyone wants this.

  5. Emmeline says:

    I think part of the issue is that “rubber bullets” sound harmless, in the same vein as “rubber chicken” or “rubber johnny” !
    Maybe they should be called “maiming bullets” !

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv badge