Christianity Falling, Christianism Rising
Why should it be that a country only nominally (ie. barely actively) Christian should see a rise of zealous Christianism? David Pollock of the British Humanist Association has a suggestion:
The churches are making a huge comeback in their influence and power over our lives – and they are doing so with the complicity and encouragement of our politicians. It started with the Blair government’s instant acceptance of the Church of England’s 2001 plans to open more schools (and use them to secure the church’s future rather than see them primarily as a public service).
Of course he has a point – our politicians have, in the post-ideological era, decided that there’s advantage to be had in courting the vote of the religiously zealous. In the age where identity politics are everything and where belief has misguidedly been given legislative protection under the banner of ‘equality’, they think pandering to pre-Enlightenment attitudes will gain them easy power. They may be right, but why, when Pollock suggests this appeal shouldn’t fall on fertile ground, does it?
I think Frank Swain identified much of the answer in his excellent talk for the Westminster Skeptics a few weeks ago. We’re not just in an age of identity politics, we’re in an age where we have innumerable claims to the truth coupled to a delivery device unheard of in history. It’s no surprise that the Internet has allowed Islamists to spread their myths with alarming ease – with such an effective bully pulpit (the ‘net is hardly the Enlightening force many had hoped – in large measure the converted continuously preach only to the converted) their Christian counterparts have even decided to speak like us. We say the earth is 4.5 billion years old, and we know it from carbon dating. They say carbon dating methods are unreliable and the earth is only 6000 years old. Emboldened by stealing our clothes they’re on the rise, but surely we live in an age of reason, where education and knowledge are everything?
Watched Big Brother lately? How many people think Raoul Moat was a hero? Who thought Jade Goody was a role model? Being an idiot makes you rich and famous in the blink of an eye. Being a murderer makes you a folk hero. Is it because of the absence of ideology, have scientists failed to make their case to the current generation, or do we just take society’s embracing of Enlightenment values for granted? Are fairy stories just plain more entertaining and comforting than cold, hard emotionless facts? Well I don’t think so. Check Professor Brian Cox and his science/documentary series ‘Wonders of the Solar System’, standing up relentlessly for science and evidence-based policy-making, whilst bringing rockstar-like energy to the subject of cosmology. Prof Cox is fast gaining Dawkins-style reverence, and for all the right reasons; Christianism won’t gain a foothold everywhere.
But we do live in a society now fully marketised, where everything is given a financial value, leading to very clear winners and losers. Should it be any surprise that the economic losers – be they the Joe Cienkowskis of this world or Nigerian migrants – find solace in what makes them feel safe and valued, even if that means denouncing science and reason? We ignore this issue more than any other at our peril if we really care about the direction in which our society’s values are going. It would be easy merely to denounce African churches which label children ‘witches’, or the Vatican for its relentless interference in the lives of the most vulnerable, but those values which allow these backward steps to take place represent a retreat more than anything – people are afraid. The West now lives under a neo-liberal economic consensus, barely questions it and then wonders why segments of the population do everything they can not to take part in that order. The rise of Christianism could easily be undermined if we came up with more believable solutions about how to be a more inclusive society.
Arguing Against Creationism
I see so much garbage on the web and Twitter about how evolution is the ‘creation story’ to atheism’s ‘religion’ these days, and it really gets my back up. There’s little more infuriating to me than modern human beings denying reason, science or the proven natural order of things. How anyone can get away with being a religious literalist in this day and age in any society, given the wealth of evidence to back up the science, is completely beyond me. Just today I’ve spoken to a fool who insisted neanderthal man looked just like us, and without any sense of irony.
This video is just one attempt by evolutionary scientists to refute creationism and Biblical literalism, but it’s a good one. Enjoy.
“A society that turns its back on reason and prefers ideology is headed towards some kind of theocracy.” – James L Powell, Ph.D.
Homeopathy by the (mind-boggling) numbers
I have just purchased a packet of Boots-brand 84 arnica homeopathic 30C Pills for £5.09, which Boots proudly claim is only 6.1p per pill. Their in-store advice tells me that arnica is good for treating “bruising and injuries”, which gives the impression that this is a very cost-effective health-care option.
Unlike most medication, it didn’t list the actual dose of the active ingredient that each pill contains, so I checked the British Homeopathic Association website. On their website it nonchalantly states that to make a homeopathic remedy, they start with the active ingredient and then proceed to dilute it to 1 per cent concentration. Then they dilute that new solution again, so there is now only 0.01 per cent of the original ingredients. For my 30C pills this diluting is repeated thirty times, which means that the arnica is one part in a million billion billion billion billion billion billion.
The arnica is diluted so much that there is only one molecule of it per 7 million billion billion billion billion pills.
It’s hard to comprehend numbers that large. If you were to buy that many pills from Boots, it would cost more than the gross domestic product of the UK. It’s more than the gross domestic product of the entire world. Since the dawn of civilisation. If every human being since the beginning of time had saved every last penny, denarius and sea-shell, we would still have not saved-up enough to purchase a single arnica molecule from Boots.
Then the process of consuming enough pills to get that one molecule also boggles the mind. You can try imagining Wembley Stadium completely filled with people, all drinking pints of medicine at the rate of two an hour. For just one of these people to eventually consume one molecule, you would need a million Wembley Stadiums all at full capacity with people who have drinking pints constantly since the Earth formed 4.5 billion years ago. Oh, and you’d need 737 million such Earths.
That’s only for one molecule. Molecules are tiny: it takes about a billion of them to cover a standard metric full-stop. To put homeopathy in a medicinal context, if you wanted to consume a normal 500mg paracetamol dose you would need ten million billion homeopathic pills. Where each pill is the same mass as the Milky Way galaxy. There is actually not enough matter in the entire known Universe to make the homeopathic equivalent of a single paracetamol pill.
So why are Boots putting their trusted name on pills that are labelled as a medicinal product, but contain nothing other than sugar? They’ve come out and said that there is no evidence to suggest that homeopathic remedies are efficacious but they will sell them if people believe they work.
Homeopathy is actually based on 18th century wishful thinking that water will somehow remember substances that it had previous contact with (but will forget the countless effluent that it has passed through). That a 10 billion year old water molecule will remember everything it has touched flies in the face of all known science and is an insult to any thinking person. Sincere people with medical needs buy homeopathic remedies only because they masquerade as being something more than mere sugar pills.
They are an insult to the herbal remedies on the shelf next to them at Boots; at least snake-oil has the decency to contain some snake.
Matt Parker is based in the School of Mathematical Sciences at Queen Mary, University of London. He has no connection with any part of or person in the pharmaceutical industry. The working for his maths is shown here.