Film Review: RED (Spoilers)

They do still have it, it’s true. And if director Robert Schwentke and screenwriters Jon and Erich Hoeber had played to that, you’d have had a film truly worthy of Warren Ellis and Cully Hamner, the co-creators of the DC/Wildstorm book, upon which the film is based. The tone of the adaptation is completely different for starters, sure – Bruce Willis’ retired CIA assassin Frank Moses isn’t a cold, relentless killer with room in his heart only for pensions clerk Mary-Louise Parker, before killing everyone in Langley for trying to off him in his retirement. The film’s Frank Moses instead has friends – the batshit crazy John Malkovich, Morgan Freeman, who lives in a care home, and the deadly Helen Mirren, who although retired still kills a bit on the side. He cracks a bit wise, but the film’s Moses is still targeted for assassination by the CIA, here by up-and-coming CIA assassin Karl Urban, who is as unquestioning as Willis was in his youth and is no less deadly.
The movie fast becomes a good humoured road trip around the US, as Moses tries to stay one step ahead of Urban, who is in turn being controlled by nefarious people behind key figures in the CIA. Will he and his gang stay alive long enough to track down who’s behind the plot to kill them? It’s an awful lot of fun, with Malkovich’s excellent insane act (we need more of him on screen please), Freeman’s normal stoicism commanding every scene he’s in, and Willis is well enough cast as Moses, although the gleam in his eye was occasionally jarring (Sin City proved he can do without). The film offers some quite sharp commentary on age too, with the parallels between Willis and Urban clear, and Helen Mirren effectively stealing the show out from under the men, but for some unknown reason she and her male cohorts are only allowed to burn slowly on screen, rather than explode. You are granted what becomes a rollercoaster ride, sure, but it surely would have made better sense to have taken these larger than life personalities and let them off the leash. The first half of the film also suffers from far too little energy – it takes far too long to get to Malkovich and for the wisecracking to start in earnest; artist Cully Hamner imbued the book with more pathos than the film has, and with less plot to work with.
From the amount it’s earned, ‘RED’ has successfully made a statement about age in Hollywood. Willis and co couldn’t have been more warmly embraced by audiences both sides of the pond, and rightly so – it’s wonderful to see these greats so warmly embraced. It may not be a perfect film – Parker’s role for example is horribly underwritten and occasionally fully out of step with the characters around her, the dark rationale behind the book is ditched in favour of a generic conspiracy theory, and Willis could have been much truer to Ellis’ Moses, but the film gets right more than it gets wrong. Pity that its moments of real bite – Malkovich running with a suicide jacket at the vice president (Julian McMahon), pretty much any scene Mirren is in – weren’t more plentiful.
7/10
Film Review: The Expendables (Spoilers)
Ignore the plot holes a mile wide, the performances (especially Lundgren’s) which should never have been allowed on a small screen, let alone a large one, the absence of character development and ridiculous motivations. It’s a back-to-basics actioner, more fun than most people would care to admit, and even though Sly looks far too tired (acting as well as directing seems to have worn him out), he’s managed to deliver a perfectly good no brainer in a summer largely filled with pretentious garbage. Oh and The Governator is back, accompanied by the best line in the film too…
6/10
Film Review: Surrogates (Spoilers)
It’s awful. So so awful. Not really ‘Catwoman’ level awful, but it’s not far off. In a near future where we live our lives through real world robotic surrogates, where crime has been obliterated and discrimination mostly removed, a murder takes place. It’s not just any murder victim, but the son of the inventor of the surrogates technology (James Cromwell). Whodunit? The leader of the anti-surrogates human community The Prophet (Ving Rhames)? Willis’ boss on the force (Boris Kodjoe)? It takes quite a long time to get somewhere blindingly obvious. Yes, Zephrem Cochrane really is the good guy and the bad guy too. Yes he knows how to jump into any surrogate and make them do his bidding (Rhames is also a surrogate you see). It’s all very tedious and obvious. Brucie even undoes utopia for the sake of mankind. It’s very noble and heroic. Yawn yawn yawn.

It’s just not remotely interesting. Don’t get me wrong there are some fascinating issues in play. When the real world and cyberspace exist as one, what elements of human nature would persist? Would people such as Willis’ wife (Rosamund Pike) use the technology to escape the horrors of real life such as grief? How disorientating might it be to be the only, imperfect human in a world of perfect robotic simulacrums? What would the implications be to warfare when no soldier need fight again? One lackey early on reveals the ability to tap into every surrogate’s visual feed worldwide, offering a glimmer of hope that the film might tackle the thorny, real-world issue of state surveillance and the inevitability of government abuse of power that is given to them by individuals. Sadly though screenwriters Michael Ferris and John D Brancato never take any of these threads anywhere, and leave the film as bland and lifeless as its outset.
Bruce Willis offers very little. Yipee-ki-yay in 2009? Not really – he’s wooden as a surrogate (the CGI needed to create his robotic look is annoying to put it mildly), and he’s ungainly and unsympathetic as a human, largely moping and looking anxious rather than acting. Maybe he knows he’s in a duff film and just gave up early – if so it’s a shame. He and we have been let down by director Jonathan Mostow, who had interesting makings and let them get away from him. It could have had the pacing of I, Robot, the insight of Terminator (and Mostow’s third installment in the franchise wasn’t this bad), and I’m sure Robert Venditti and Brett Weldele’s comic book source material was impressive, but noone seems to know where the focus of this film should be. It ends up being a waste of everyone’s time.
4/10